WE WON!! To God Be the Glory!
- Life Tabernacle Church
- May 13, 2022
- 1 min read
Louisiana Supreme Court Justice Crain:
In this criminal proceeding, we find certain provisions of two executive
orders, as applied to defendant, violate his fundamental right to exercise religion, do
not survive strict scrutiny, and are thus unconstitutional.
Read full ruling here!!!
Ücretsiz Rastgele Cinsel Sohbet Uygulaması.
Sohbet uygulamaları ücretsiz.
Cinsel sohbet Uygulaması.
Görüntülü Sohbet Uygulaması.
Gabile Sohbet Uygulaması.
Canlı Sohbet Uygulaması.
Yetiskin Sohbet Uygulaması.
Cinsel Chat Uygulaması.
Gabile Chat Uygulaması.
Canlı Chat Uygulaması.
Görüntülü Chat Uygulaması.
Sohbet Uygulaması.
Mobil Sohbet Uygulaması.
Sohbet Odaları ücretsiz üyeliksiz.
The Constitution for The United States of America was intended by its Framers to limit the powers of the federal government, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to themselves and their Posterity. In the formation of our nation's federal government, they sought to protect the Unalienable Rights of every American to life, liberty, and property, which come to us, by the way, not from any government, but from the Creator, who etched them, as with a sunbeam, into the Laws of Nature itself.
Unalienable Rights are Natural Rights--the birthright of all free human beings. The Constitution is merely every American's personal guarantee that these and other Eternal Rights would remain "Unalienable," meaning they cannot lawfully be separated from us under any circumstances, because they are ours forever. In fact, such Rights would not ever be separated from us by any legitimate government that is lawfully functioning in accordance with the stated purposes of its own existence. After all, those purposes, which are set out quite clearly within our nation's Constitution, limit the powers of government, and secures the Rights of the American People forever, at all times, and under all circumstances.
I carefully read the court's decision, and I agree with the state's supreme court Chief Justice's dissent, that no evidence was presented, just quotes from other cases, and it's why he suggested this case be remanded back to District Court, to study the evidence herein for this Court's decision. It was only ONE church, OBJECTING, to having outdoor services, as other churches were, at the height of the covid-19 pandemic and not as Tony Spell accused the State,of violating his religious freedom.
Yes sir to God be all glory. Thank you Jesus Christ our great apostle of heaven and earth. The kingdom of heaven is at hand. Amen our faith with stood all the attacks and God blessed us and we won. 🙌🏼